Kontakt 180Grader.dk
35

Skrevet af Isabella Balkert 512 dage siden - Direkte link

Her fortæller Nigel Farage om en arrogance i EU, som man ikke drømmer om. 
Også Merkels svar på hvorfor Grækenland ikke kan gå ud af Euroen - Merkels svar er: Fordi hvis Grækenland går ud, så vil alle forlade EU og vi vil gå tilbage til at Suveræne Demokratiske Stater.
Desuden påpeger Nigel Farage, at "The Bad Guys" bare venter på at Grækenland bliver så udmarget af gæld, at man kan overtage deres rigdomme, deres olie, osv. osv.
De denne video og spørg dig selv om du vil stemme for et EU fascistisk parti ved næste valg. For hvis du gør, så stemmer du for EU og mere af det tyrani der forsøger at overtage hele Europa og gøre alle suveræne stater til slavestater af EU kommissionen og New World Order.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F4rWdJ7JDcU&feature=related


Skrevet af Søren Mortensen 512 dage siden - Direkte link

"Patriotism is the virtue of the vicious."


Skrevet af Jacques d´Biann 512 dage siden - Direkte link

Påstand.


Skrevet af Word 512 dage siden - Direkte link

Denne blog er skrevet af en nationalistisk semi-socialist / socialdemokrat 


Skrevet af Jonas H 512 dage siden - Direkte link

Von misses, "Socialism", side 29:

 

Marx and Engels  never tried to refute their opponents with argument. They insulted, ridiculed, derided, slandered and traduced them, and in the use of these methods their followers are not less experts. Their polemic is directed never against the argument of the opponent, but always against his person.


Skrevet af Word 512 dage siden - Direkte link

Hvis du kigger på DF's arbejdsprogram - især deres socialpolitik (de elsker den store socialstat med det socialistiske princip om "fri og lige adgang"), sunhedspolitik (de går massivt ind for statsligt formynderi og er stor modstander af legalisering af cannabis og andre rusmidler), erhvervspolitik (de er bla. tilhænger af erhvervsstøtteordninger og etableringsydelsen), arbejdsmarkedspolitik (har kæmpet hårdt for bevarelse af efterlønsordningen) og mediepolitik (de går ind for medielicensen) - vil du se, at mit udsagn blot er en konstatering!

 

Husk nu også på, at formanden for DF kalder sig selv en ægte socialdemokrat ; )


Skrevet af Jonas H 512 dage siden - Direkte link

Et andet karakteristika ved komunismens følgesvende(også beskrevet af Von Mises) er deres evne til at afvise forslag og ideer baseret på karakteren af afsenderen, altså vil det, for en komunist, være nok at påvise at afsenderen ikke er komunist for at afvise forslaget eller ideen, uanset om forslaget/ideen ellers ville være noget en komunist kunne tilslutte sig.

 

Dont go down this road my friend.....


Skrevet af Word 512 dage siden - Direkte link

Jeg har ikke afvist nogle forslag eller nogle ideer i denne tråd, men blot konstateret, at blog-skriveren er repræsentant for et parti, der på mange områder er semi-socialistisk / socialdemokratisk ; )

 

 

Du battler mod dit eget spøgelse (opfundet til lejligheden), my friend ; )


Skrevet af slettet bruger 3421 512 dage siden - Direkte link

Og hva' så, du er jo repræsentant for multikulti-fanatiske toosehoveder som radigalninge og LA'ere, det er faktisk langt værre og ikke mindst meget, meget dyrer. Så heller de nationalistiske socialdemokrater, de kommer sgu til at koste skatteyderne langt mindre.


Skrevet af Word 512 dage siden - Direkte link

Jeg er kun repræsentant for mig selv og mine egne holdninger!

 

Jeg er liberalist og taler derfor imod venstrefløjspolitik - også den nationalistiske udgave


Skrevet af Jonas H 512 dage siden - Direkte link

Manden raser mod Nazismen, kommunismen, Islamismen og facismen, noget som enhver liberal burde kunne tilslutte sig. Alligevel fokusere du på at han er socialdemokrat...

 

Hence:

Marx and Engels  never tried to refute their opponents with argument. They insulted, ridiculed, derided, slandered and traduced them, and in the use of these methods their followers are not less experts. Their polemic is directed never against the argument of the opponent, but always against his person.


Skrevet af mohqal 512 dage siden - Direkte link

Kære Word

 

Du spurgte engang i adskillige debatter, om en bestemt debattør var homophob. Fik du nogensinde svar ?


Skrevet af Word 512 dage siden - Direkte link

@Jonas H

 

Du battler stadigvæk mod spøgelser.

 

Jeg fokuserer alene på partiet DF, der er semi-socialistisk og hylder en gammel ørken-religion kaldet kristendom. Jeg har ikke forholdt mig til bloggens indhold, da jeg ikke har læst den. Al kritik af nazisme, kommunisme, islamisme og fascisme er skønt og velkommen, det mener de fleste vidst

 

 

@mohqal

 

Jesper Ørsted trak sig fra den pågældende debat ; )


Skrevet af Jonas H 512 dage siden - Direkte link

Jeg fokuserer alene på partiet DF

Jeg har ikke forholdt mig til bloggens indhold, da jeg ikke har læst den

Dette er jo netop min pointe, du forholder dig ikke til hvad han skriver, men alene hans ophav. Fremgår det ikke klart...?

 


Skrevet af Ole 512 dage siden - Direkte link

Måske er Ridder Winston Churchill ikke den bedste at citere fra, når man gerne vil vise sin afstandtagen til "internationale" idelogier som fascisme og nazisme. Han havde stor ros til disse to internationale ideologier, mens han derimod ikke brød sig om to andre internationale ideologier: kommunismen og "den internationale jødedom" (han kunne godt lide "nationalt sindede jøder" men mente at jødedommen havde to indbyggede tendenser - en god og en ond - og at mange af verdens dårligdomme altså skyldtes de onde internationale jøder).

 

Churchill om fascismen:

I could not help being charmed, like so many other people have been, by Signor Mussolini’s gentle and simple bearing and by his calm, detached poise in spite of so many burdens and dangers. Secondly, anyone could see that he thought of nothing but the lasting good, as he understood it, of the Italian people, and that no lesser interest was of the slightest consequence to him. If I had been an Italian I am sure that I should have been whole-heartedly with you from the start to finish in your triumphant struggle against the bestial appetites and passions of Leninism. I will, however, say a word on an international aspect of fascism. Externally, your movement has rendered service to the whole world. The great fear which has always beset every democratic leader or a working class leader has been that of being undermined by someone more extreme than he. Italy has shown that there is a way of fighting the subversive forces which can rally the masses of the people, properly led, to value and wish to defend the honour and stability of civilised society. She has provided the necessary antidote to the Russian poison. Hereafter no great nation will be unprovided with an ultimate means of protection against the cancerous growth of Bolshevism.

Churchill om nazismen:

While all those formidable transformations were occurring in Europe, Corporal Hitler was fighting his long, wearing battle for the German heart. The story of that struggle cannot be read without admiration for the courage, the perseverance, and the vital force which enabled him to challenge, defy, conciliate, or overcome, all the authorities or resistance’s which barred his path. He, and the ever increasing legions who worked with him, certainly showed at this time, in their patriotic ardour and love of country, that there was nothing that they would not dare, no sacrifice of life, limb or liberty that they would not make themselves or inflict upon their opponents.

(..)

One may dislike Hitler's system and yet admire his patriotic achievement. If our country were defeated, I hope we should find a champion as admirable to restore our courage and lead us back to our place among the nations

Churchill om "internationale jøder":

 

There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution, by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews, it is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd) or of Krassin or Radek -- all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combating Counter-Revolution has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially in Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many non-Jews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing.Needless to say, the most intense passions of revenge have been excited in the breasts of the Russian people.

 


Although in all these countries there are many non-Jews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing. The fact that in many cases Jewish interests and Jewish places of worship are excepted by the Bolsheviks from their universal hostility has tended more and more to associate the Jewish race in Russia with the villainies which are now being perpetrated”.

Needless to say, the most intense passions of revenge have been excited in the breasts of the Russian people.

(..)

In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish effort rise the schemes of the International Jews. The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing.

Og når Søren Espersen citerer Churchill i et indlæg, der delvist handler om racisme og naziternes syn på "undermennesker", så burde han måske have læst på lektien først, for på dét område holdt Churchill sig bestemt ikke tilbage.

 

Churchill om racehiearkier og "undermennesker":

I do not agree that the dog in a manger has the final right to the manger even though he may have lain there for a very long time. I do not admit that right. I do not admit for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher-grade race, a more worldly wise race to put it that way, has come in and taken their place

Du skal være logget ind for at kommentere artikler. Du kan logge ind her!

Flere artikler fra Politik

28
22
26
10
47
17
15
29
17
30
12
39
7
16
8
11
39
7
15
9